ONGOING
Learn exactly how rollups work technically, the difference between optimistic and ZK rollups, how they inherit Ethereum's security, and why they're central to the blockchain scaling roadmap in 2026.
What Are Rollups? Executing Off-Chain, Settling On-Chain
Rollups are a specific Layer 2 scaling architecture where transactions are executed off the main chain but their data and proofs are posted back to the main chain. The name comes from 'rolling up' many transactions into a single batch that gets settled on Layer 1.
The key innovation is separating execution from settlement. Execution is fast and cheap when done off-chain by a rollup operator. Settlement on Ethereum is expensive, but by batching thousands of transactions into a single settlement, that cost is amortized across all the transactions in the batch.
Data availability is crucial: the transaction data (though not execution) must be posted to Ethereum so that anyone can reconstruct the rollup's state and verify its integrity. This data availability requirement is what gives rollups their security properties, as opposed to sidechains which do not post data to Ethereum.
Optimistic Rollups: Fraud Proofs and the Challenge Period
Optimistic rollups process transactions off-chain and submit state roots (cryptographic summaries of the rollup's state) to Ethereum. They are 'optimistic' in that they assume transactions are valid unless challenged.
The challenge mechanism is the fraud proof system. After a state update is posted, there is a window of approximately seven days during which any participant can submit a fraud proof demonstrating that the state transition was invalid. If a valid fraud proof is submitted, the fraudulent update is reversed and the proposer loses a bond.
In practice, fraud proofs have rarely been needed because operators have strong economic incentives to be honest. The mechanism functions as a deterrent.
The seven-day challenge period is the primary user-facing limitation. Native withdrawals back to Ethereum mainnet require waiting this period. Third-party bridge protocols provide instant exits by fronting the liquidity themselves and waiting for the challenge period on the user's behalf.
ZK Rollups: Validity Proofs and Instant Finality
Zero-knowledge rollups take a fundamentally different approach. Instead of assuming validity and allowing challenges, they generate a cryptographic proof (a validity proof or ZK-SNARK/STARK) that mathematically guarantees every transaction in a batch was executed correctly according to the rollup's rules.
This proof is verified by a smart contract on Ethereum mainnet. If the proof verifies, the state update is accepted and becomes final immediately. There is no challenge period because no trust is extended. The mathematics either prove validity or they do not.
Generating ZK proofs is computationally intensive, which historically made ZK rollups more expensive to operate and harder to build. Advances in ZK proof systems and dedicated hardware have dramatically reduced proof generation times and costs. By 2026, ZK rollups can process high transaction volumes efficiently with near-instant finality.
Data Availability: The Key Security Property
The security of both optimistic and ZK rollups depends critically on data availability: the guarantee that transaction data is publicly accessible so anyone can verify the rollup's state.
If a rollup operator posts state roots to Ethereum but withholds the underlying transaction data, users cannot verify the state is correct or reconstruct their balances. This data withholding attack would compromise the rollup's security.
Ethereum's EIP-4844, implemented in 2024, introduced a new data storage mechanism called blobs that significantly reduced the cost of posting rollup data to Ethereum. Blobs provide cheaper data availability compared to calldata, which directly reduced L2 transaction fees across all major rollups.
Ethereum's full data availability roadmap, called danksharding, will further increase blob capacity and reduce costs, continuing the trajectory of making L2 transactions cheaper as Ethereum's own capacity grows.
Rollups vs. Other Scaling Approaches
It is worth understanding how rollups compare to other blockchain scaling approaches that have been used or proposed.
Sidechains like the original Polygon PoS chain run independently with their own consensus mechanisms and only use Ethereum for bridging. They are faster and cheaper but do not inherit Ethereum's security. A sidechain can be compromised without Ethereum being at all affected.
State channels, like Bitcoin's Lightning Network, allow participants to transact off-chain with only the opening and closing channel states settled on-chain. They are very efficient for specific peer-to-peer payment use cases but do not support general smart contract execution.
Validiums post proofs to Ethereum but store data off-chain, offering lower costs than rollups but weaker data availability guarantees. They are suitable for specific high-throughput applications like gaming where absolute data availability guarantees are less critical.
Rollups offer the best combination of security and scalability for general-purpose smart contract execution, which is why they became Ethereum's chosen scaling strategy.
Rollups: The Technical Foundation of Ethereum's Scale
Rollups represent a technically elegant solution to one of the hardest problems in distributed systems: how to scale transaction throughput without sacrificing the security and decentralization of the base layer.
The choice between optimistic and ZK architectures involves genuine tradeoffs around finality speed, proof generation complexity, and EVM compatibility, all of which continue to evolve as the technology matures.
For users, the internal mechanics matter less than the outcome: fast, cheap transactions that settle on the most secure blockchain in existence. For developers and researchers, understanding rollup mechanics is essential for building and evaluating the next generation of blockchain applications.
This information, including any opinions and analyses, is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice or recommendation. You should always conduct your own research before making any investment decisions and are solely responsible for your actions and investment decisions.
The services of Freedx are not directed at, or intended for use by residents of the United States, Canada, and the United Arab Emirates, nor by any person in any jurisdiction where such use would be contrary to local laws or regulations.
© 2025 Freedx, All Rights Reserved