ONGOING
Learn how to correctly size positions in crypto trading, the Kelly Criterion, fixed percentage methods, how volatility affects sizing, and how position sizing determines long-term results in 2026.
Position Sizing: How Much to Risk on Every Trade
Position sizing determines what percentage of your trading capital you allocate to any individual trade. It is arguably the single most important decision in trading, more consequential than which assets you pick or which technical pattern triggered your entry.
The reason position sizing matters so much: it determines the size of both your wins and your losses. Perfect trade selection with poor position sizing produces poor results. Merely adequate trade selection with excellent position sizing produces sustainable returns.
Most new traders focus on finding the right entry and ignore position sizing almost entirely. Professional traders treat position sizing as the primary variable they control and entry timing as secondary. This inversion of priorities is one of the clearest markers of trading sophistication.
The Fixed Percentage Method: Simple and Effective
The most practical and widely used position sizing method is the fixed percentage approach: risk a fixed percentage of your total capital on each trade, typically one to two percent.
This means that if your stop-loss is placed 10 percent below your entry price and you risk two percent of capital per trade, your position size is twenty percent of your total capital. If your stop is only two percent below entry, your position size would be one hundred percent of capital, which is too large, indicating you need a wider stop.
The advantages of fixed percentage sizing are compounding (position sizes grow automatically as capital grows), survivability (even a long losing streak leaves capital intact for recovery), and consistency (the same risk is applied regardless of emotional state or recent performance).
A ten-trade losing streak at two percent risk per trade leaves you with approximately eighty-two percent of your starting capital. At five percent risk per trade, the same streak leaves sixty percent. At ten percent, thirty-five percent. The mathematics of ruin are dramatically affected by position sizing.
The Kelly Criterion: Optimal Sizing by Edge
The Kelly Criterion provides a mathematically optimal position sizing formula based on your expected win rate and average win/loss ratio.
The Kelly formula is: win rate minus (loss rate divided by win/loss ratio). For a strategy with 55 percent win rate and 1.5:1 average win/loss: Kelly fraction = 0.55 minus (0.45 divided by 1.5) = 0.55 minus 0.30 = 0.25, or 25 percent of capital per trade.
Full Kelly sizing maximizes long-run geometric growth rate but produces enormous volatility in the portfolio path. A 50 percent drawdown is statistically expected even on a profitable full Kelly strategy. For this reason, most practitioners use fractional Kelly, typically 25 to 50 percent of the full Kelly fraction, which significantly reduces volatility while retaining most of the long-run compounding benefit.
The Kelly Criterion requires accurate estimation of win rate and win/loss ratio. Using historical performance metrics with insufficient data leads to Kelly fractions that are over-optimized to past results and too aggressive for future conditions.
Volatility-Adjusted Sizing: Equal Risk Across Different Assets
Different crypto assets have dramatically different volatility characteristics. Bitcoin is less volatile than most altcoins. A small-cap altcoin may make daily moves twice as large as Bitcoin.
Volatility-adjusted sizing ensures that each position carries approximately equal risk in dollar terms regardless of which asset is traded. This prevents altcoin positions from dominating portfolio risk simply because they are more volatile.
ATR (Average True Range) is a practical tool for volatility adjustment. If Bitcoin's 14-day ATR is $2,000 and you want to risk $500 per trade, you size your position so that one ATR move equals your risk: $500 divided by $2,000 equals 0.25 Bitcoin. If a small-cap token has an equivalent ATR of 20 percent of its price and you want the same $500 risk, you size accordingly.
Volatility-adjusted sizing is particularly important for portfolio management where you hold positions in multiple assets with different volatility profiles. Without volatility adjustment, your most volatile positions will dominate portfolio performance regardless of your intended allocation.
Common Position Sizing Mistakes and How to Avoid Them
Several position sizing mistakes are extremely common among retail traders and consistently damage long-term performance.
Oversizing winners: after a series of profitable trades, traders often increase position sizes significantly, creating concentrated risk right when their recent success may be an artifact of favorable market conditions rather than lasting edge.
Martingale sizing, or doubling down on losers, is catastrophically dangerous in markets that can trend strongly against you. Adding to losing positions without clear technical rationale simply increases the size of a position that is already demonstrating it is wrong.
Ignoring correlation: sizing positions independently without considering their correlation creates hidden portfolio concentration. Ten positions in different altcoins, each sized at two percent, may behave like a twenty percent concentrated bet if they all move together during a market downturn.
Not adjusting for drawdown: your position sizing should always be based on current capital, not peak capital. After a twenty percent drawdown, sizing two percent of current capital means two percent of the reduced amount.
Position Sizing: The Variable You Control
Unlike market direction, which cannot be controlled, and entry timing, which can only be optimized within the limits of analysis, position sizing is entirely within your control. It is the most reliable lever for improving trading outcomes.
The fixed percentage method provides a practical, simple framework accessible to any trader. For those who want to optimize further, fractional Kelly sizing based on strategy metrics adds another layer of refinement.
The most important position sizing habit to build is applying it consistently and mechanically, without deviation based on conviction, recent performance, or emotional state. The discipline of sizing every trade identically according to your predetermined rules is what converts good trade selection into sustainable profitability.
This information, including any opinions and analyses, is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice or recommendation. You should always conduct your own research before making any investment decisions and are solely responsible for your actions and investment decisions.
The services of Freedx are not directed at, or intended for use by residents of the United States, Canada, and the United Arab Emirates, nor by any person in any jurisdiction where such use would be contrary to local laws or regulations.
© 2025 Freedx, All Rights Reserved